Yeah, yeah, yeah.
■ What to Read Now. And Why
■ Now, Read it Again
■ The Write Stuff
■ Best. Books. Ever.

"

✦ Established in October 2003 for readers, thinkers, and autodidacts ✦
___________________________________________________________________________
ABOUT & DISCLOSURE ■ NIGHTSTAND ■ PARENT-TEACHER ■ BARDOLATRY ■ BIRDING ■ ART ■ GEAR

Here we go again..."Tears In The Darkness," which Garner says "seamlessly blends a wide angle view with the stories of many individual participants" is the narrative account of the first major land battle for America in World War II and America's worst military defeat. We wanted to avoid writing history from on high, so the book looks at war from ground level, from the point of view of the men who lived that history. We want readers to see war, feel war, experience it on the page -- the suffering, the terror, the loss. A number of readers and reviewers have suggested that "Tears" reads like a novel.Intrigued, I read the four-chapter excerpt they had attached and visited their website. And I was hooked. The library had just received its copy of Tears in the Darkness, which is now on my nightstand. Join me in learning more about Ben Steele and the Bataan Death March.

Perhaps in a naïve effort to deny that inconvenient truth, the debate about intelligence has become largely political, at times even facetious. Intelligence certainly is not the only predictor of success in work or in school, college, or scholarship, but it's as strong as any. Unfortunately, it's also largely genetic. Social justice, treating people the same, bringing out their best abilities are all worthy ideals. Yet we must be cautious when ideals conflict with reality. The world in which we live has no obligation to be politically correct. And it is not politically correct to say that one person is, well, simply more talented than another.Ayup.
A good teacher can often improve the academic performance of poor or mediocre students. Good students can perform in spite of poor or mediocre teachers (although it is a disservice; ask anyone who did so, who performed well enough in spite of an incompetent teacher, or coach, or piano instructor). Good teachers and good students can make magic together. Great teachers and great students? Oh, that is the stuff of memorable years and classes, isn't it? And, yes, great students can and should outpace their teachers. But put a poor or mediocre teacher and poor or mediocre students together, and the results are always going to be poor or mediocre. In other words, the program can only go as high or as far as its engine permits, no matter how well all of the parts get along.


The amount of data we’ll have at our fingertips will be staggering, but we’ll finally have gotten over the notion that accumulated information alone is a hallmark of intelligence. The power of all of this knowledge will come from its ability to inform difficult decisions, and to support complex analysis. Most professions will likely use simulation and modeling in their day-to-day work, from political decisions to hairstyle options. In a world of augmented intelligence, we will have a far greater appreciation of the consequences of our actions.

Part of the incredulity the APA discussion has generated in the media and blogosphere is doubtless because bitterness strikes the person feeling it as a justified response to a social ill or personal wrong. It may be an exaggerated, distorted perception to which, Linden wisely notes, "revenge is not a treatment." But just one of the many reasons for alarm here is the thought of the DSM, of all documents, trying with a few vague, open-ended criteria to legislate what is reasonable bitterness and what is not. (If you knew that "fear of eating alone in restaurants" and "avoidance of public restrooms" were both official symptoms of social anxiety disorder, among the most widely diagnosed of mental illnesses in the United States, you'd share my concern.)Ayup.

This is particularly true of Molly Bloom’s closing soliloquy, which may end on a “Yes” but is tragic in its implications. Here is a wakeful woman, beside her sleeping husband, left with nobody to talk to but herself. After an afternoon assignation with her lover, she feels compelled to m-st-rb-te repeatedly in the bed, because her visitor took all the pleasure for himself. The blank pieces of paper which she posts to herself seem like emblems of her lonely condition, just as her “yes” seems a desperate tactic to convince herself that life is better than it is. When the Irish actress Fionnuala Flanagan performed the monologue in this way on an American campus in the 1980s, some elderly professors handed back their membership cards to the Joyce Association in disgust at her alleged blasphemy against a sacred text.Not Marty. Like us, he was staggered by Flanagan's interpretation. Oh, what a discussion followed.
I grow old . . . I grow old . . .Do you want me "to bring it all home"? Okay. Modernists Eliot and Joyce (and Ezra Pound) influenced, nay, arguably shaped twentieth-century literature. In a 1922 review, Eliot described Joyce's Ulysses as "the most important expression which the present age has found." It's no small coincindence that Eliot identified the "mythical method" in Joyce's work: "The Waste Land" was meant to be read as a mythic quest, too.
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.
Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach?
I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.
I do not think that they will sing to me.
"'I grow old... I grow old... I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.' What does that mean, Mr. Marlowe?"Also from The Long Goodbye:
"Not a bloody thing. It just sounds good."
He smiled. "That is from the 'Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.' Here's another one. 'In the room women come and go/Talking of Michael Angelo.' Does that suggest anything to you, sir?"
"Yeah -- it suggests to me that the guy didn't know very much about women."
"My sentiments exactly, sir. Nonetheless I admire T. S. Eliot very much."
"Did you say, 'nonetheless'?"
I'm a licensed private investigator and have been for quite a while. I'm a lone wolf, unmarried, getting middle-aged, and not rich. I've been in jail more than once and I don't do divorce business. I like liquor and women and chess and a few other things. The cops don't like me too well, but I know a couple I get along with. I'm a native son, born in Santa Rosa, both parents dead, no brothers or sisters, and when I get knocked off in a dark alley sometime, if it happens, as it could to anyone in my business, and to plenty of people in any business or no business at all these days, nobody will feel that the bottom has dropped out of his or her life.The company of books is unimaginably rich.



I wonder how much it would take to buy a soap bubble,
Here we go again...p. 25Just trust me on this one: It's a must-not-miss.
My dream is to walk around the world. A smallish backpack, all essentials neatly in place. A camera. A notebook. A traveling paint set. A hat. Good shoes. A nice pleated (green?) skirt for the occasional seaside hotel afternoon dance.
p. 46
What can I tell you? The realization that we are all (you, me) going to die and the attending disbelief -- isn't that the central premise of everything?
It stops me dead in my tracks a dozen times a day. Do you think I remain frozen? No. I spring into action. I find meaningful distraction.
p. 52
Sometimes when I imagine my own death, I believe I will be reunited with my loved ones. We are all floating around in a fluffy sky.
I get a delicious cozy feeling.
But then I remember that even my loved ones are sometimes very irritating and even infuriating -- so what is that about? And what would we do all day forever?
Besides, the whole thing is insanely unlikely. I prefer the notion of Heaven on Earth. Of sweet, funny, loving moments.
1. Always be looking. (Notice the ground beneath your feet.)■ The Lightning Thief (Rick Riordan)
2. Consider everything alive and animate.
3. Everything is interesting. Look closer.
4. Alter your course often.
5. Observe for long durations (and short ones).
6. Notice the stories going on around you.
7. Notice patterns. Make connections.
8. Document your findings (field notes) in a variety of ways.
9. Incorporate indeterminancy.
10. Observe movement.
11. Create a personal dialogue with your environment. Talk to it.
12. Trace things back to their origins.
13. Use all of the senses in your investigations.
p. 95■ After Photography (Fred Ritchin)
"But those are just--" I almost said myths again. Then I remembered Chiron's warning that in two thousand years, I might be considered a myth.
