"" Mental multivitamin: 12.04




Established in October 2003 for readers, thinkers, and autodidacts
___________________________________________________________________________

ABOUT & DISCLOSURENIGHTSTANDPARENT-TEACHERBARDOLATRYBIRDINGARTBOOKSTOREGEAR


12.30.2004

BOB: The Best of Blogs Awards 2004

Finalists in some of the categories of this awards program (sponsored by WiredHub.net) were announced today.

Guess which blog is a finalist in the category "Best Literary/Book Blog."

Ayup.

Now that was fun news.

Many thanks to the folks who nominated us and to the panelists who named us among the finalists.



Graphic and link added when button became available January 1, 2005.

Tomorrow is New Year's Eve.

The material below ran a year ago today in an entry entitled "'Death Planet,' prions, and suggestions for a happy (or at least not pitiful) new year."

Let me appeal to your petulant elitist side (as opposed to your lurking egalitarian side), and entreat you to make no "promises to self" that involve measuring your food or rearranging your bedroom to accommodate a large, ugly treadmill or other torture device. If rooms must be arranged, let it be to make way for more bookshelves or a roll-top desk with countless cubbies. Nordic Track, indeed. What, bosh. Walk to the bookstore or the library if you need to tone and firm. But invite ugliness into your home? Bleah. Never.

Avoid resolving to lose ten pounds, run two miles daily, and get up at 5 a.m. every day to accomplish it. These are resolutions built like Chevy Cavaliers and Nabisco Sugar Wafers (that is, not to last).

Similarly, avoid the dangerous slip-slide into self-pity and -recrimination that can be the thirty-six hours before January 1. (Hint: The slip-slide usually begins when you reluctantly switch from seasonal music, and in a desperate bid to find music to which you can relate, you put on a station or cd that violently jerks you back to your late teens and early twenties.) Folks, this is not where you want to be.

Stop the insanity!

Put on some jazz or classical. Relax with a cup of Trader Joe's French roast and a small slice of their New York cheesecake.

Ah, better.

Now.

If you must list and sort and promise, well, will these work?

(1) Resolve to read more, think more, write more, learn more. Update your wishlist at Amazon.com.

(2) Subscribe to a magazine that opens new worlds to you. (No, Entertainment and People don't count.)

(3) Promise yourself more than twenty minutes daily to think, a space-time into which nothing and no one can creep without your express mental invitation. It is in this quiet zone that you will uncover your creativity.

(4) Begin a correspondence with someone who will share your reading discoveries.

(5) Keep a reading log, noting favorite passages.

These are resolutions built to last.

Brain backslide

In response to this message, the incomparable R.T. muses:

Okay, so human brains are on an evolutionary fast track. I don't know about anyone else, but this scares me.

Fast track to where? To what?

Someone said (I can't remember who) that already we humans live in much angst because we have more knowledge than we are capable of acting upon. Certainly it's true that there is more information out there right now than I can act on in my daily life. Does this mean some day I will be able to hold all that information in my pumpkin-size head and comprehend accordingly? But what will I do with all that?

My fear is that, while the brain may be evolving faster than an evolutionary speeding bullet, the body still has only two arms, two legs, two eyes, two ears... you get it. Chug, chug. Huff, puff. It just can't keep up. And I just can't act on the measly little I do know. Much less some day when that brain is understanding and comprehending ideas and events that encompass what I can't even fathom today.

Maybe it's true that those who may be a little smarter, may have a little edge on a day to day basis. But sometimes it's also true that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. And is understanding and knowing without the equal ability to act, a darkness that is worth it because it will enable us to act more humanely, or will it just make us more helpless, more numb in our inability to physically act?

Thoreau said, "Knowledge is acquired only with a corresponding experience." I'm exhausted already. And T.S. Eliot said, "All our knowledge brings us nearer to our ignorance." Dark possibilities, indeed.

Well, it's probably a moot question, that of "to where our brains are evolving," because I haven't seen anyone prove yet the evolutionary train has an emergency pull.

I guess that's why we humans also have hope. And with that hope, I have to assume nature will provide in a sort of balancing act. Which makes me wonder again. Will a third arm go on the chest or the back? Will that extra digit eliminate all typos? Ahhh, but I am certain an eye in the back of the head will be a boon to mothers of young children everywhere.


Heh, heh, heh.

Badge of competence

From "The Mother Tongue" (Prospect, Jan. 2005):

Some people stress the importance of grammar, in the sense of educated speech and writing; others, in reaction, deny that it matters, and may even claim that it is an elite conspiracy to keep the proles in their place. A similar reaction insists that the English language is in good health, and that there is no need to be concerned about it. This was the claim made by Jean Aitchison at the time of her Reith lectures in 1996, but she seemed to have no criteria for distinguishing good language from bad. It is certainly wrong to suppose that languages cannot improve or deteriorate, or to deny that different languages have particular strengths and weaknesses. Among the disadvantages of English, for example, are the comparatively inflexible word order, the use of "s" both for the genitive case and for the plural and a general excess of sibilance, the inability to distinguish the singular and plural of the second person, and the awkwardness of having to use "it" for what the French distinguish as il and ce. The strength of English is the variety of its registers. The base of our language is Germanic, but it has been overlaid in three stages by words of Latin derivation: those that arrived in Anglo-Saxon times, those that came from French after 1066, and the abstract vocabulary that entered from the Renaissance onwards. We have cases of two words derived from the same Latin original, such as "frail" and "fragile," or "ransom" and "redemption." Good prose can exploit this range of register. We can use short, plain words or sesquipedalian polysyllables; we may want to use both.


Role of a Lifetime
From Phil Rosenthal's column (Sun-Times) today:

Orbach's Briscoe could steal scenes with a subtle cock of an eyebrow or a well-placed one-liner. You could practically hear Wolf in those wry cracks, and you just knew he and his staff loved writing for the guy.
...

And he could be just downright funny, like the time he was asked if a weapon of any kind had been found in a suspect's home. "Not unless you count the world's most boring record collection," Briscoe said.

Little wonder viewers took to him the way they did. As a performer, Orbach may have had a bigger impact as a song-and-dance man on Broadway. But it's impossible to have been in people's homes for as long as Detective Briscoe was without leaving a mark there as well.

Stream of consciousness

Another uncharacteristic entry from the folks who bring you "On the nightstand," "Chevalier Noir for the Mind," "Talk to Them," and "The sountrack of our life."


The mid-twenties version of me recklessly spent $5 or $8 or even, once or twice, $12 on a bottle of shampoo. In the $5 to $9 range was a bottle of Aveda back in 1992. It smelled good. Very good. I will not forget how good because I left the bottle of pricey shampoo in my sister’s shower caddy during a trip in August of that year. She shipped it back, but — inexplicably — the cap loosened enough to drip, drip, drip as it traveled from one coast to the other. Hmmm, this smells so good! I breathed, accepting the box from the mail carrier.

And so it goes.

And yesterday I stood in Target in front of the vast selection of Suave shampoo — the brand middle-aged autodidacts who wear the old coat to buy the new books favor — and thought, not for the first time, either, if only I could have the difference, bottle for bottle, between the shampoo I bought in the eighties and nineties and the shampoo I’ve been buying since becoming a mother of two and then three — what a tidy sum I’d have now to spend on books.

And laundry detergent! The same lament. For years, thinking only Tide or Era would do when Purex, which, for the budget-unconscious, runs $3 to $4.50 less than Tide or Era — cleans my clothes as well. Just as well.

And milk. Well, for our first four years in Chicago, nearly four gallons a week. Another child. Practically a gallon a day. $3.29 a gallon at Jewel-Osco. Another child. More milk. Lumbering through the narrow checkout lane at Osco, one girl on each hip, a strong, young son behind, he hugging one gallon, I dangling one from each mannishly strong index finger. Plop. Plop. Plop. A ten spot and then some to cover — milk! Outrageous, I confided to the woman scanning my milk. Yes, she replied, softly. That’s why I get my milk at White Hen. White Hen? Yes. Hmmm. We found the Hen. $1.99 a gallon. I wept. $1.30 times several hundred gallons. Oh, the books, the books, the books that could have purchased.

Buy your books used, Kevin chided. He introduced to me to many city treasures — like Powell's. Save your money. But, sadly, many of my “used” companions are the ones I least like to hold. They were cheaper, yes, but some of them also seem cheap. It’s a special person who prefers to cradle someone’s discard. I am not special. I want my marginalia to stand alone, not beside some glib undergrad’s. All right. So I don't usually write in my books. But if I did? And I want my spines uncreased. The pages unbent. The dust jackets clean and pressed. I want my books to smell new. Inhale. Ahhhh! If only Kevin had offered something useful, like, Buy your milk at the White Hen, or, Suave works as well as Aveda. But, Buy used? That was not helpful.

Kevin had talent and intelligence, probably a couple of tablespoons more of each than I. But I had ambition and pride, too. A Type-A to his Type-B. Guess which one of us the vice presidents preferred to work with. Guess which one nearly lost his job half a dozen times. Guess which one didn’t care — not before the crisis (usually a missed deadline that I could have helped him meet — had he only remembered to write it on the production schedule or even just tell me), not during (Are. They. Done. Yet. he once signed to me, as two of the vice presidents argued over which of Kevin’s shortcomings was the most offensive. Why. Am. I. Here. I signed back. They. Like. You. And I liked that.), not after (Don’t worry about it. Okay.). But then guess which one of us decided to stay home with the baby. Both babies. Ayup. Both of us.

Both of us had girls. Baby girl. Pause. Surprise! Baby girl. Both of us had gorgeous baby girls. In Kevin’s case, this was not surprising: His wife, who had never liked anyone else he had worked with but liked me, was startlingly beautiful. I am, of course, average. My husband is average. Kevin is average. (His previous co-workers were not average. Heh, heh, heh. And then Kevin married.) The law of averages? Kevin and I both had gorgeous baby girls. This will be harder for him than for me. I wonder what Kevin will say to the young men who arrive on his doorstep in a decade. Why. Are. You. Here. he will sign. Because I like her, they will reply. Oh. Okay.

(My son was in school when I had baby girl, pause, surprise, baby girl. For the record, he is gorgeous, too.)

Kevin read Journey to the End of the Night on the el. I read Operating Instructions that night. We talked all day at work. Said nothing on the train ride home until his stop. See ya’ tomorrow. Bye. Never saw him again. Just a handful of short telephone calls (Where is the schedule? On the board. Oh. Yeah. Are you coming back? No, but don’t tell them. I won’t.) and email messages (Your kid is cute. Thanks.) and that was that. A message from a former coworker: Kevin stays home with the kids. His wife works. He left before they could fire him.

Good for him. And so it goes.

I bought Celine’s Journey to the End of the Night. New. I haven’t read it. I haven’t read a lot of the books on my shelves. And that’s okay. They read me.

Reading is, like writing , a solitary pursuit. You read beside your husband. Sometimes you read to him or he to you. That’s nice. And sometimes, okay, often, you read to the children. And they to you. But the reading — finding the inflection and cadence that are this character’s and the face that is that; arguing with the writer about this premise and nodding to him about that — is, essentially, a loner’s pursuit.

I am a loner.

No comments because I am a loner. That’s what I was thinking the other day when yet another visitor asked why we didn’t enable the comments. It's free, you know. Um, yes. I know. But so is, say, listening to the country music radio station, and I don't do that, either. I sent off the pat answer about controlling the content. The truer answer is this: I’m reading. I’m writing. I’m thinking. And while a few “regulars” (who, like Kevin, probably have a couple of tablespoons (nay, cups) more talent and intelligence than I (it’s not flattery; it’s the truth; you know who you are — as always, thank you)) make me think, most of the rest do not.

And so it goes.

Enabling comments might result in the sort of idle and small talk I loathe, and I would be obligated to respond because, after all, I invited the idle and small talk by enabling the comments. Yes, I've commented here and there. Nothing bad happened. But as a daily exercise? It would suck the life out of the un-blog.

Readers and visitors, I want and expect nothing from you. Really. If you want to give, though, give me a recommendation. A challenge. A reminder. A smart chiding. Teach me. Make. Me. Think. But then go away. (And I mean that nicely. I do.) Go away and do your own reading and writing and thinking. Because the coffee here wasn’t brewed for company, folks.

I don’t like company. Except my sister. Who doesn’t feel or act like company. I was wrong, by the way. If she lived closer, I probably would see her often. My sister. She is the sort who would have been able to tell the mid-twenties version of me that most shampoo is created equal, that milk is cheaper at White Hen, and that Purex cleans clothes just as well as Tide or Era. Only I didn’t talk to her much when I was in my mid-twenties.

I have certainly paid for it.

And so it goes.

The recommended daily allowance

You'll get it if you've read "Stream of consciousness."



12.29.2004

Jerry Orbach died yesterday.

From the Associated Press an hour ago:

Actor Jerry Orbach, who played a sardonic, seen-it-all cop on TV's "Law & Order" and scored on Broadway as a song-and-dance man, has died of prostate cancer at 69, a representative of the show said Wednesday.


From M-mv post "On the nightstand (under the pillow, in the knapsack, etc.)" (5.19.2004):

My great fondness for Jerry Orbach can be traced to the early eighties and his starring role as Julian Marsh in 42nd Street. This then-seventeen-year-old thespian watched the entire musical pitched forward, chin in hands, elbows on knees, in the mezzanine, sighing over a man old enough to be her father but cool enough to be, well, on Broadway. Two years later, as Luisa in The Fantasticks (a community theater production, folks; no (off- or even off-off-) Broadway babes here), I entreated our El Gallo to channel Mr. Orbach. Oh, to be kissed upon the eyes by...! Alas, no.)


From M-mv post "'You ever pay for it, Lenny?'" (5.20.2004):

So long, Lenny. The precinct won't be the same without you. Am I kidding you?

"If I was kiddin' you, I'd be wearin' a fez, and no pants."

So, the human brain was on the evolutionary fast track, eh?

From "Human brain result of 'extraordinarily fast' evolution Emergence of society may have spurred growth" (The Guardian):

The sophistication of the human brain is not simply the result of steady evolution, according to new research. Instead, humans are truly privileged animals with brains that have developed in a type of extraordinarily fast evolution that is unique to the species.

"Simply put, evolution has been working very hard to produce us humans," said Bruce Lahn, an assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago and an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

"Our study offers the first genetic evidence that humans occupy a unique position in the tree of life."

American Red Cross Disaster Relief

More than 50,000 people have lost their lives in East Africa and South Asia in the aftermath of the earthquake and resulting tsunamis on December 26. The American Red Cross reports that emergency assessment and first-aid teams were on the ground quickly and are already working with local groups to support relief efforts. If you would like to help, you can make a financial donation to the American Red Cross using the Amazon Honor System. According to Amazon, one hundred percent of donations made will go to the American Red Cross disaster relief efforts.

Amazon Honor System

Click Here to Pay
Learn More

Portrait of the Artist

On this day in 1916, James Joyce's book Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is published in New York. The book had been previously serialized in Ezra Pound's review The Egoist.

More from The History Channel here.

(Note: If you don't have a copy of The Book of Literary Days, "This Day in History" can jumpstart second-breakfast-table discussion.)

Portrait is standard AP English fare, and my earmarked, Post-It-note-filled copy of Ulysses (by way of grad school) stands on my shelf as a highmark of student achievement (although I must admit that I'm not sure I would have made it through without Professor Marty N's help), but it is the simpler The Dubliners to which I return. From "The Dead":

Gabriel felt humiliated by the failure of his irony and by the evocation of this figure from the dead, a boy in the gasworks. While he had been full of memories of their secret life together, full of tenderness and joy and desire, she had been comparing him in her mind with another. A shameful consciousness of his own person assailed him. He saw himself as a ludicrous figure, acting as a penny-boy for his aunts, a nervous, well-meaning sentimentalist, orating to vulgarians and idealizing his own clownish lusts, the pitiable fatuous fellow he had caught a glimpse of in the mirror. Instinctively he turned his back more to the light lest she might see the shame that burned upon his forehead.


Not to know your wife's Michael Furey, not to realize that such a one might exist seems to me to be not to know your wife.


M-mv on James Joyce

"Bloomsday" (6.16.2004)

"Unapologetic" (2.13.2004)

"The recommended daily allowance" (2.13.2004)

"Oh, who is it you wish to see?" (12.1.2003)

12.28.2004

Author and Activist Susan Sontag Dies

Article here.

Shorter days

From Tom Skilling's column in today's Chicago Tribune, "Aftermath of the earthquake: Shorter days":

[T]he magnitude 9.0 earthquake that struck off Sumatra on Sunday morning caused a vertical displacement of so much material that the rotation period of the Earth has been permanently altered... [T]he Earth is now rotating more quickly on its axis, and the 24-hour day is now one ten-thousandth second shorter... It is estimated that during the Sumatran quake, a block of material roughly 600 miles in length and 100 miles in width fell 30 feet closer to the Earth's axis of rotation. The planet has responded by rotating more rapidly....

The Hookie Awards

Columnist David Brooks writes:

Some people say that the age of the public intellectuals is over, that there are no longer many grand thinkers like Lionel Trilling or Reinhold Niebuhr, writing ambitious essays for the educated reader. It's true that there are fewer philosophes writing about the nature and destiny of man, but there are still hundreds of amazing essays written every year.

In celebration of that fact, and in case you're looking for some mind-expanding holiday reading, I've decided to create the Hookie Awards. Named after the great public intellectual Sidney Hook, they go to the authors of some of the most important essays written in 2004.


The Hookie Laureates are linked in two New York Times articles, here and here. Remember: Registration to read the NYT online is required but free, painless, and quick. For a sample of the treasures that await you, here is a link to one of the Hookie Laureates, "The Other Sixties," which ran the Wilson Quarterly, a publication we at M-mv have only recently added to our must-read list (and have already linked here twice).

The recommended daily allowance

For more wonderful essays, read what we're passing back and forth with enthusiasm and many a Post-It note:



This year's volume was edited by Louis Menand, who we've enthusiastically recommended here and here.

12.27.2004

Collected miscellany

Why we at M-mv adore R.T.

In a message titled "A few thoughts on your recent blog-posts," M-mv fave R.T. writes:

— On autodidacticism: This is why my 92-year-old grandmother knows Keats and Longfellow and Scott much better than her contemporaries Fitzgerald, Steinbeck, and (heaven forbid that really new guy) Updike. "Those guys," she would say of the former, "Stood the test of time. And besides," she would add with a grin, "I didn't have the sock money for the upstarts."

— On the limited release: Also code for "will not appeal to a mainstream audience." Count me in.

— While Wodehouse and Milne may have had their private battles, and the literati may prefer the seduction of Wodehouse to the craft of Milne, the comparison of Milne to Barrie is obtuse. In my view, no one can deny that Milne said in a few sentences what it took Barrie an entire book to relate.

"Well," said Rabbit, after a long silence in which nobody thanked him for the nice walk they were having, "we'd better get on, I suppose. Which way shall we try?"

"How would it be," said Pooh slowly, "If, as soon as we're out of sight of this Pit, we try to find it again?"

"What's the good of that?" said Rabbit.

"Well," said Pooh, "we keep looking for Home and not finding it, so I thought that if we looked for this Pit, we'd be sure not to find it, which would be a Good Thing, because then we might find something that we weren't looking for, which might be just what we were looking for, really."

— And the answer to "Does a family require more than one gaming system?" Is just "What family?"

Autodidacticism

Working-class autodidacts read the classics in part because contemporary literature was too expensive. A 1940 survey found that while 55 percent of working-class adults read books, they rarely bought new books. An autodidact could build up an impressive library by haunting used-book stalls, scavenging castoffs, or buying cheap out-of-copyright reprints such as Everyman's Library, but these offered only yesterday's authors. Thus Welsh collier Joseph Keating (b. 1871) was able to immerse himself in Swift, Pope, Fielding, Richardson, Smollett, Goldsmith, Sheridan, Keats, Byron, Shelley, Dickens, Thackeray, and Greek philosophy. There was one common denominator among these authors: all were dead. "Volumes by living authors were too high-priced for me," Keating explained, but that did not bother him terribly. "Our school-books never mentioned living writers; and the impression in my mind was that an author, to be a living author, must be dead; and that his work was all the better if he died of neglect and starvation."


The complete article can be found here.

The Merchant of Venice

I'm betting that "limited release" can be understood as "no way is this playing in your little town." Ah, well. I don't mind the drive to Piper's Alley.

Clips.

"Jeeves versus Pooh"

From the Boston Globe:

We can say that he knew exactly what he was doing. A comparison with J. M. Barrie, author of "Peter Pan" and an early sponsor of Milne's career, is handy here. Where Barrie was a wizard, Milne was a conjurer; he knew children, could perform brilliantly for them, but he lacked -- did not want -- Barrie's magic cloak of misery, the lonely shroud (materialized in a series of oversized greatcoats) within which the sunken little Scotsman could incubate his fantasia. Milne's Hundred Acre Wood is tastefully free of the billowing nostalgia of Kenneth Grahame's "Wind in the Willows," or the terrors and yearnings of Barrie's Neverland. It tickles and it charms, but the world of Pooh is less a halcyon vision of childhood than a scale model -- stuffed animals that bubble into a fitful sentience in the mind of one very closely and cleverly observed little boy. It was this knowingness that exposed the Christopher Robin books to the accusation, made by Dorothy Parker, of "sedulous cuteness."


A little science
I'm not one for all the "top [insert number here] lists" that run in the papers during these last days of the year, but "Top Science Stories of 2004" is certainly a list worth exploring.

What were they thinking?
Have you seen this story? Here are my thoughts: Does a family require more than one gaming system? Did the parent have no clue prior to purchasing the three gaming systems that his children were misbehaving? Does anyone else think that this stunt was one man's bid for his Warholian fifteen minutes?

12.26.2004

"Flaccid salute to mushy multiculturalism"

From "Give me seasonal schmalz":

And yet the truth is I rather like this annual Christmas controversy. For one thing it helps to debunk one of the more absurd myths about America that the rest of the world clings to — that it is firmly in the grip of some theocracy in which schoolchildren learn creationism by rote and White House officials slaughter the fatted calf before drawing up their foreign policy plans.


Speaking of flaccid and mushy, those Harry and David gift baskets have nothing on Delicious Orchards. Sorry. That's just the opinion of one overalls-wearin', Mountain Dew-swiggin', Pelican Shakespeare-thumpin' autodidact.

The day after Christmas in links



Words

Congo (Michael Crichton)

The Tombs of Atuan (Ursula LeGuin)

Samantha Saves the Day

Kirsten's Surprise

Stiff: The Curious Uses of Human Cadavers (Mary Roach)

The Best America Essays 2004 (Louis Menand, editor; M-mv on Menand)

Shakespeare After All (Marjorie Garber)

Skywatch '05

Chicago Sun-Times (M-mv on the Sun-Times)


Moving pictures

Fargo
Jerry Lundegaard: Well, heck, if you wanna play games here! I'm workin' with ya on this thing, but I... Okay, I'll do a damned lot count!
Marge Gunderson: Sir? Right now?
Jerry Lundegaard: Sure right now! You're darned tootin'!


And those not pictured:

Super Size Me
At the San Francisco premiere Spurlock said that getting permission to shoot in NYC McDonalds was often denied (in which case they would often hide the camera or go out to the car and eat), but to acquire consent in less paranoid cities generally consisted of the following exchange: "What are you guys filming here?" "We're shooting a MOVIE!" "OK."


The Princess and the Pauper

King Lear
Fool: If thou wert my fool, nuncle, I'd have thee beaten for being old before thy time.
Lear: How's that?
Fool: Thou shoulds't not have been old till thou hadst been wise.


Props

The Bubba Keg, filled with Trader Joe's French roast

Compaq laptop

Yankee Candle (Macintosh, of course)

Scented pine cones

Reading glasses (they're no longer just helpful; they're must-haves)


Some gifts

Micropets

TYR ("socket-sucking") swim goggles with bungee strap

The dusting of snow (which is all I asked for Christmas)

A corner of the country and its clear, blue sky (which, apparently, I needed more than I realized)

The Stepford Forum Redux

V. shared her thoughts on our recent entry. She writes, in part:

I can understand the degeneration. It's an almost 100% female. Women are just prone to the trivial and banal. Our desire is to share of ourselves and build relationships with others. In other words, we like to tell others how we feel and to know what they are feeling. And face it... most of our lives are rife with the trivial and banal. My teen is backtalking me. My husband won't carry his share of the housework. I got a wonderful new coat on sale! [etc.]

Deep thinking takes time and effort. Sharing that thinking requires others to put forth time and effort to understand what I'm trying to communicate and then some more time and effort to mull it over and formulate a response.

Our society isn't really big on the time and effort thing. We much prefer instant gratification. The titillation of voyeurism. With the double click of the mouse I'm can eavesdrop on someone else's life.

Anyway, didn't mean to ramble on, just point out that we as people, in forum or out, tend to rise to the lowest common denominator. We are a weak and silly lot.

I think that there is something within us all that pulls us in the direction of Homer. Homer Simpson, that is.

And face it, we all like to be the biggest fish in the pond. Who likes to be reminded over and over that we aren't quite all we think we are?

I personally have been giving a bit of thought finding some way to get out into the larger world, just for that purpose. I'm very certain if I really did hang with a few deep thinkers I'd get a whole new perspective on myself.

Merry Christmas and, as always, thanks for the inspiration and encouragement.


You're welcome, V. Right back at you.

12.24.2004

10:17 a.m. on Christmas eve



Waiting.

Two hours for Mr. M-mv and Master M-mv to return from a last-minute run to the grocery store and Blockbuster.

Six hours for the stew, which would have been ready at 3 p.m. had Mrs. M-mv remembered to turn it on after mixing in all of the ingredients.

Forty minutes for the "Happy Birthday, Jesus!" cake. Yeah, we're an odd lot of beliefs, celebrations, and convictions. (About the cake: "What sort of cake shall we make this year? Well, we made yellow every year so far. Chocolate cake? With chocolate icing? Well, okay." Confiding to Aunt M-mv later, "What sort of karma is at work when one unwittingly prepares devil's food cake for Jesus' birthday?")

Eleven hours for bedtime.

Twenty-four hours for the Christmas anti-climax.

Three hundred sixty-some-odd days until the child's vigil of belief begins again.

Happy waiting, readers, thinkers, and autodidacts. Happy waiting.

The recommended daily allowance

The best way to spread Christmas cheer is singing loud for all to hear.





Family M-mv laughed and laughed.

It's just nice to meet another human that shares my affinity for elf culture.



Look, it's not all Shakespeare and Wagner here. If you've been laboring under that misconception, get over it. We quote from The Godfather, Hamlet, and Elf; LOTR, The Nightmare before Christmas, and A Charlie Brown Christmas; It's a Wonderful Life, Heaven Can Wait, and Fargo; Citizen Kane, The Importance of Being Earnest, and, yes, Stripes.

You know who you are, you who mistake the pursuit of excellence for snobbery. You've grievously misjudged us. Grab a Dew or an ugly mug filled with French roast brewed dark and strong, and give us another look.

Read. Think. Learn.

And laugh.

__________________________

Name that movie

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual. But now I know why I have always lost women to guys like you. I mean, it's not just the uniform. It's the stories that you tell. So much fun and imagination.


To lose one parent, Mr. Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune. To lose both looks like carelessness.


You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in... 60 years.


I'm not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police work, there, Lou.


I know how you feel about all this Christmas business, getting depressed and all that. It happens to me every year. I never get what I really want. I always get a lot of stupid toys or a bicycle or clothes or something like that.


You've poisoned me for the last time, you wretched girl!


I feel thin... sort of stretched, like butter scraped over too much bread. I need a holiday. A very long holiday. And I don't expect I shall return. In fact I mean not to.


What a piece of work is man. How noble in reason. How infinite in faculty. In form and moving how express and admirable. In action, how like an angel. In apprehension, how like a God. The beauty of the world. The paragon of animals. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust. Man delights not me.


Do you spend time with your family? Good. Because a man that doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man.


Former Owner: He got my team. The son of a bitch got my team.
Advisor to Former Owner: What kind of pressure did he use, Milt?
Former Owner: All I asked was sixty-seven million, and he said "okay."
Advisor to Former Owner: Ruthless bastard.

Rethinking Thoreau

From "Buyer's Remorse" (The Wilson Quarterly):

The popular image of Thoreau is of the lone eccentric contemplating nature at Walden Pond. In fact, he spent only two years and two months there, and while he always preferred to be thinking and writing, he spent much of his life improving his father’s pencil business, surveying land, and otherwise earning money. Of course, Thoreau scorned business as anything more than a means to an end. His literary output, mostly ignored in his lifetime, won a wide audience over the years, in part, perhaps, because of the triumph of the materialism he so reviled. Thoreau’s instinctive disdain for moneymaking, his natural asceticism and implicit environmentalism, his embrace of civil disobedience, and his opposition to slavery all fit him well for the role of patron saint of American intellectuals.

12.23.2004

Spreading good cheer

Below I've listed some bloggers who not only send their readers my way but also make me think. An eclectic bunch, I know, but check them out.

The Rage Diaries

Semicolon

Megan and Murray

Ever so humble

Outer Life

Shockingly Provincial

Dominion Family

Quiet Life

Buried Treasure

Bread Crumbs

Thoughtful Spot

A Circle of Quiet

12.22.2004

Four hundred years

For those who still haven't finished Don Quixote (and those who purchased Grossman's amazing translation with excellent intentions): an opportunity to get with the program --- "World cities to celebrate Don Quixote, 400 years on."

12.21.2004

On the nightstand (under the pillow, in the knapsack, etc.)



Ayup. It's that time again. Have a look at the books on our nightstands, under our pillows, in our knapsacks, beside our coffee mugs, and beneath our tree.

Shakespeare (but, of course)
Shakespeare After All (Marjorie Garber)
Did you catch the short piece in the recent Newsweek? From "Bard Watch: A Shaker and a Mover":

Marjorie Garber's "Shakespeare After All" devoted 900-odd pages to lucid elucidations of the plays—300 pages longer than "I Am Charlotte Simmons," and a better read.


M-mv on Shakespeare
"The Shakespeare Project of Chicago" (10.22.2004)

"How did Shakespeare become Shakespeare?" (9.14.2004)

"The recommended daily allowance" (4.23.2004)

"No greater witness to humanity" (4.7.2004)

"Shakespeare for kids" (4.5.2004)

"The recommended daily allowance" (4.4.2004)

"A Midsummer Night's Dream" (3.31.2004)

"Shakespeare redux" (3.21.2004)

"She speaks poniards, and every word stabs." (3.14.2004)

"Slush, Shakespeare, space, and other stuff" (2.18.2004)

"The recommended daily allowance" (11.10.2003)


Joseph Epstein
A Line Out for a Walk
Epstein is an M-mv favorite; we've recommended him to our readers often.


M-mv on Epstein
"The hopeless attempt to stay forever young" (7.7.2004)

"Your writing fool" (4.24.2004)

"It is a curious phenomenon..." (2.14.2004)

"The recommended daily allowance" (1.11.2004)


A publishing event
Housekeeping (Marilynne Robinson) was released in 1981 to critical acclaim, but somehow I missed it. I'm reading this wonder now before grabbing a copy of Robinson's new novel, Gilead. From the NYT review "Acts of Devotion":


To bloom only every 20 years would make, you would think, for anxious or vainglorious flowerings. But Marilynne Robinson, whose last (and first) novel, "Housekeeping," appeared in 1981, seems to have the kind of sensibility that is sanguine about intermittence. It is a mind as religious as it is literary -- perhaps more religious than literary -- in which silence is itself a quality, and in which the space around words may be full of noises. A remarkable, deeply unfashionable book of essays, "The Death of Adam" (1998), in which Robinson passionately defended John Calvin and American Puritanism, among other topics, suggested that, far from suffering writer's block, Robinson was exploring thinker's flow: she was moving at her own speed, returning repeatedly to theological questions and using the essay to hold certain goods that, for one reason or another, had not yet found domicile in fictional form.



Why read?
A Scream Goes Through the House: What Literature Teaches Us About Life (Arnold Weinstein)

How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines (Thomas C. Foster)

These two books are must-haves for autodidacts with a passion for understanding and teaching literature. And I've already written about two other must-haves in this category: Edmundson and Bloom.


Others on the pile
Mr. M-mv is still at sea with the Aubrey/Maturin novels, and Master M-mv is reading American Soldier (Tommy Franks). The Misses M-mv have several books going, but they brought The Storm (The Lighthouse Family) (Cynthia Rylant) and Firewing (Kenneth Oppel) to the photo shoot.

Yeah, and that's The Lord of the Rings on the pile, too. Have you, like Family M-mv, found yourself referring back to the text (over and over again) only to realize that as grand as Peter Jackson's vision is (and it is, really; we do love it), the story is most fully realized as text?



Library finds
Now, I thoroughly enjoyed Christopher Moore's Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal (see our 3.1.2004 RDA), but The Stupidest Angel just doesn't deliver.

Neither does The Know-It-All: One Man's Humble Quest to Become the Smartest Person in the World (A. J. Jacobs).

Godless (Pete Hautman), on the other hand, garnered a thumbs-up from both Master M-mv and me. We recently read Stephen Mitchell's brilliant translation of The Book of Job (Mitchell most recently released a new version of Gilgamesh; see our entry "A grief ago") and are now tackling Archibald Macleish's J.B.: A Play in Verse (speaking of brilliant). Godless, a young adult novel, is a compelling complement to these great works about the nature of faith... and religion.

Speaking of faith, from The Quotidian Mysteries: Laundry, Liturgy and "Women's Work" (Kathleen Norris):

Our culture's ideal self, especially the accomplished, professional self, rises above necessity, the humble, everyday, ordinary tasks that are best left to unskilled labor. The comfortable lies we tell ourselves regarding these "little things" -- that they don't matter, and that daily personal and household chores are of no significance to us spiritually -- are exposed as falsehoods when we consider that reluctance to care for the body is one of the first symptoms of melancholia. Shampooing the hair, washing the body, brushing the teeth, drinking enough water, taking a daily vitamin, going for a walk, as simple as they seem, are acts of self-respect. They enhance one's ability to take pleasure in oneself and in the world.


And then there are those apparently hellbent on avoiding everyday pleasures. Oh, you know them. They are the folks who spend so much time bemoaning the demands of house, spouse, and offspring that one must wonder, "Why must they write (badly, at that) about this? Wouldn't the time be better spent getting the tasks done and done well?"

I'm just saying.


A note about the ugly sweater
That oversized, pill-covered, decade-old garment is incredibly warm. I can't imagine winter without it.


Previous "On the nightstand" entries:
I'm not an "Oh, where has Time gone?" sort of gal, but, I confess, the realization that this is the thirteenth "On the nightstand" entry caught me by surprise.

11.21.2004
10.12.2004
9.13.2004
8.24.2004
7.19.2004
6.12.2004
5.19.2004
4.22.2004
3.12.2004
2.15.2004
1.26.2004
12.31.2003

The Bubba Keg



Imagine, if you will, the Bubba Keg (a gift from Aunt M-mv) filled to capacity (52 ounces) with Trader Joe's French roast, brewed dark and strong, the way a certain autodidact favors it.

Imagine, then, said autodidact carrying this somewhat unseemly looking mug from room to room this holiday season — sipping, sipping, sipping.

Now contemplate the effects of 52 ounces of caffeine on that autodidact.

Yes, it made us giggle, too.

The Stepford Forum

Writers, scientists, and others who make the sociology of the virtual their life's work have probably developed learned treatises concerning the nature of group dynamics at work in such online forums as message and chat boards. That these studies haven't crossed my desk is, I know, my loss because their work could probably explain how, for example, a forum's intellectual vigor can so easily be replaced by chatter only a half-step up from the buzz of a polite secretarial pool.

How and, perhaps, why.

Without the benefit of some serious scholarship on this subject, though, I'm left to wonder whether something decidedly Stepfordian is at work when a (virtual) gathering of thinkers and learners is replaced by a (virtual) Ladies Society.

Maybe that's just the way things go.

In my inexperience, I'll posit only this much: Forum brain drain -- the flight of bright, talented (and, by extension, challenging) contributors -- eventually yields banality. That a slip-slide into banality leads to forum brain drain is a sort of Catch-22 given.

And that's too bad. For all of us.

12.19.2004

Walking a prairie trail in winter



May your holiday season be filled with laughter, long walks, and the pale glow of lanterns; homemade cookies, Homer and Shakespeare and Dickens and Charlie Brown, and the soft sigh of young voices singing Christmas carols as they play; snow, silence, and (did I mention?) homemade cookies.

May your days be merry and bright.

May your Christmas be white.

May you drive right past the mall and its undulating mass of consumers, and may you find a convenient parking spot near the entrance of the museum... or nature center.

May you eat heartily without remarking on another diet plan.

May you sleep... and actually rest.

May you read on the couch surrounded by some of your favorite people, who are also reading... and eating heartily.

May you share your holiday with the sort of people who encourage double-dipping... and spending most of the day in pajamas.

May this wonderful week be, in fact, wonderful.

Best regards, readers, thinkers, and autodidacts.

12.17.2004

Blogging respite

Aunt M-mv is here! Aunt M-mv is here! So it's "blog-lite" for a few days.

Two links today, both of which should make you think.

From "The End of the world: A brief history" (The Economist, December 16, 2004)

Why do end-of-time beliefs endure? Social scientists love to set about this question with earnest study of the people who subscribe to such ideas. As part of his investigation into the “apocalyptic genre” in modern America, Paul Boyer of the University of Wisconsin asks why so many of his fellow Americans are “susceptible” to televangelists and other “popularisers”. From time to time, sophisticated Americans indulge the thrillingly terrifying thought that nutty, apocalyptic, born-again Texans are guiding not just conservative social policies at home, but America's agenda in the Middle East as well, as they round up reluctant compatriots for the last battle at Armageddon. (It's a bit south of the Lake of Galilee in the plain of Jezreel.)

Behind these attitudes sits the assumption that apocalyptic thought belongs—or had better belong—to the extremities of human experience. On closer inspection, though, that is by no means true.


And the Sun-Times reports on the Parents Television Council's finding that "[t]elevision entertainment programs mention God more often than they did in the mid-1990s but tend to depict organized religion negatively."

"Ninety percent of the American people believes in God," said Brent Bozell, the council's president. "It is an important issue to most people. Hollywood is attacking the very thing that they consider important in their own lives. Perhaps Hollywood ought to be changing its world view."


Um, Mr. Bozell? According to your study, organized religion was depicted negatively, not God, right? I'm not so sure Hollywood, as you say, "ought to be changing its world view." At least not on this particular issue, anyway. But, then, I'm not organized religion's greatest fan, being, as I am, of great faith and no religion.

12.15.2004

Anatomy of a family illness

Last year, just after Christmas, I posted a version of the piece below in another forum. Family M-mv was sick for both Thanksgiving and Christmas in 2003, but this year, the country air (I guess?) has kept us healthy -- for which we are thankful.

May your holidays be healthy -- and happy.

_________________________

This story begins with a stoic father who, three days before Christmas, insists he is well enough to go to work, despite the tale his cheeks, which flame with fever, and eyes, which look wearier than usual, tell.

“What’s wrong? It’s not the flu, is it?” I clutch my worn-out bathrobe at the neck, as if this weak gesture will help me now.

My husband laughs at me, softly, not unkindly. “We’ve been sharing a room and a bed for nearly two decades.”

“What of it?” I sniff.

“If I’m sick, you’re going to get sick,” he cautions. “Take some extra C and some Cold-eeze. Try to get some rest.”

“‘Try to get some rest,’” I gently mock. Weekday morning farewells are conducted sotto voce; it is, after all, only 4:50 a.m. We certainly don’t want to wake the children — yet. “Oh, sure,” I whisper. “Three kids. Three days before Christmas. Rest. Yeah, that’s what I’m going to do.” I kiss the top of his head and propel him toward the door. “Leave those germs at work. Or on the el like everyone else does.”

I duck out of his embrace and close the door on Germ Man almost before he can pull his coat through. “Kiss me through the door, honey. I am not getting sick.” I press my ear against the wood panel to hear his muffled reply: “It’s just a little sore throat. I took some extra C. I’ll be fine.” He shuffles off to work in the predawn light.

And I spend the next two hours in a cleaning, disinfecting, you-germs-don’t-stand-a-chance-in-this-house frenzy. When the kids get up (“Is it Christmas yet?” “Are you sure?”), I’m dizzy from the smell of bleach, Mr. Clean, and Lysol. But I’m confident that we have won the battle and the war against cold and flu germs.

The kids make cookies and help me decorate. They enjoy the holiday read-alouds and the crafts. The days before Christmas at my house should be preserved between the covers of magazines, I smugly assure myself. What magic. What light. What wonder. What peace.

What? Yeah, well, he’s sick, but I’m taking care of him. I am! And he’s taking it like a man. Hey, if he’s well enough to go to work, he must be getting better, right?

Wrong.

On Christmas Eve, we’re able to turn down the thermostat because my husband’s feverish body is generating enough heat to warm the neighborhood. His attitude is good, though. I ply him with Tylenol, fleece coverlets, and cocoa. “But,” I admonish, “don’t even think about breathing on me or the kids.” He humbly agrees as he hands me my Christmas presents — after donning the mask and rubber gloves I purchased for him at Walgreen’s.

Once Germ Man is tucked into bed, I creep about the flat, enjoying the quiet Christmas Eve when... what!? A sneeze from one room. A rumbly cough from another. Oh, bother. I could wipe down the doorknobs again. I could give everyone another chewable vitamin C. Or I could just admit it: My throat is sore; I didn’t win the battle or the war.

No. No! Mind over matter. I am a healthy mother. Those are healthy children. My husband left his germs on the el. Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!

But I know there’s trouble, oh, yes, there is, when I awaken on Christmas Day — at 8:13 a.m. I don’t need a thermometer to know there are sick kids in this home. In addition to sleeping in on this of all days, they, well, they smell. Yeah, my kids stink when they get sick. And no bathwash or toothpaste in the world can help.

Bleah.

They’re well enough to enjoy the cinnamon muffins and the gifts. But when the oldest asks to go back to bed for a while, I resign myself to a week with a virus and begin laying old towels in a path from each child’s bed to the bathroom.

I’ll spare you the goriest details. Let’s just say that many loads of laundry and too little sleep for our protagonist follow.

By Monday morning, the guy formerly known as Germ Man is out the door again, and I survey the damage: a man-sized child sprawled on his bed, a fairy-light daughter asleep between coughing spells on hers, and the baby of the family wrapped in two covers on the couch. Somehow, despite being rooms apart, they all manage to call my name at the same time.

“Mom!”

My throat is still sore. I have a headache. An alarmingly large headache. And the coffee is taking too long to brew.

“Mom!”

This story ends with a stoic mother.

12.14.2004

The recommended daily allowance

Hold your ground! Hold your ground! Sons of Gondor, of Rohan, my brothers. I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the strength of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship. But it is not this day. An hour of woe and shattered shields when the age of men comes crashing down. But it is not this day. This day we fight! For all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, men of the West!


The problem with smart

From "Here's the Problem With Being So 'Smart'" (The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 17, 2004):

The promise of smart is that it purports to be a way to talk about quality in a sea of quantity. But the problem is that it internalizes the competitive ethos of the university, aiming not for the cultivation of intelligence but for individual success in the academic market. It functions something like the old shibboleth "quality of mind," which claimed to be a pure standard but frequently became a shorthand for membership in the old boys' network. It was the self-confirming taste of those who talked and thought in similar ways. The danger of smart is that it confirms the moves and mannerisms of a new and perhaps equally closed network.

12.13.2004

On teaching reabing

The curseb confusion of "b" and "d" is the occasional dane of a reabing teacher's existence. As many of you know, not every new reaber is marked to err in this way, but woe and worry to the teacher with a b-for-d-swapping stubent. Or two.

What a nuisance! Especially when you're trying to explain to Grandmom that, no, it's not a learning disability, and, yes, you know you didn't do it, but, no, little Jane or Jim does not need a tutor. Or a test. Just some time. Hanging up now, Mom.

And to come clean about the dane, I mean, bane in the company of other parents is essentially to ask for for someone to sniff and retort, "Well, my child never did that."

Dully for you!

I mean, bully for you!

These fascinating substitutions are actually a marvelous peek into the human brain at work. Steven Pinker touches on the subject in The Language Instinct, as does Frank Smith in Understanding Reading.

They are also the fodder for terrific in-family jokes.

Youngest child: (Reading the riddle printed on the wrapper of candy treat) What sort of cow refuses to give milk? A milk bub. Hey, what's a bub?

Oldest child: Dud! Those are D's! D's! A milk DUD! Argh!

Youngest child: Oh. I get it.

Yeah. Sooner or later, they do get it. And none of you will ever look at Milk Duds again without laughing. "Milk Bubs." Heh, heh, heh.

This entry is for the parents and teachers of young readers -- readers who read early and readers who read later; readers who sometimes swap B's for D's or, more interestingly (in my book, anyway), "said" for "and" and readers who pause after. every. single. word. ; readers who don't finish books and readers who are costing a fortune in batteries (from reading under their covers at night); readers who prefer "Okay Books" over "Great Books" and readers who read it all, including the ingredients listed on the jar of jelly.

This is an entry to assure you that teaching reading often seems harder than it is and always yields more than you can realize (at least while locked in the workaday routine of teaching and parenting young readers and budding linguists).

Your young reader will not always substitute "d" with "b" and "b" with "d". Nor will she always curl in your lap to hear a story. Nor will he will always borrow more books than he can read in two weeks.

Nope. At some point, the young readers outgrow the substitutions and our laps and a child's approach to cultural paradise that is a library, and by the time they do, they will be able to read. Just. Fine.

In no small part because of us.

Ayup.

Goob work.

Happy reabing to you anb yours.

"Excuse me, where would I get a book?"

From "Students shun search for information offline":

When students do research online these days, many educators worry, those are often about the only steps they take. If they can avoid a trip to the library at all, many students gladly will.

Young people may know that just because information is plentiful online doesn't mean it's reliable, yet their perceptions of what's trustworthy frequently differ from their elders' -- sparking a larger debate about what constitutes truth in the Internet age.


"What constitutes truth in the Internet age." What constitutes truth in the Internet age? I would think truth's essence remains unchanged, no matter what the "age," but that's just me, I guess.

Maybe it's the string of dark days. Or maybe it's that I'm nearly out of coffee. But, man, the idea of students avoiding the library sounds like the hook of a mediocre sci-fi novel, no?

Speaking of mediocrity, Ursula Le Guin is less than thrilled with the television event her magnificent Earthsea Cycle has, erm, spawned. (See "Sunken Treasure" in the December 17, 2004 issue of Entertainment Weekly. Nope. 'couldn't find a link.) "Le Guin, who was not consulted at all in the making of the film, was appalled at the first draft of the screenplay. 'They cut the whole point of the book,' she says. 'They decided that they wanted to write something about belief systems. I don't know where all that comes from except, maybe, the current troubles our country is in.'"

For more on Le Guin's take on the miniseries (which has been panned by every critic and his mother), see her website. (Scroll down a little to "Earthsea," an entry dated 11/13/2004.)

You know what I'd advise, of course: Turn off the television and (re)acquaint yourself with Ged and the magic of Earthsea.












12.11.2004

Three hundred twenty-two hours until Christmas

Ayup. According to this counter, there are thirteen days, or three hundred twenty-two hours, until Christmas.

A gentle reminder, then:

If you're enjoying your "Mental multivitamin" and a purchase -- holiday gift or otherwise -- that can be made at Amazon.com is in your future, please make your purchase via one of the many Amazon links on this site (including this one!). As we've said many times before, we're not in this for the (modest, very modest) income potential, but it does help.

Many thanks, readers, thinkers, autodidacts, and visitors.

Outer Life

We've recommended "Outer Life" before, but, in case you missed it, start here.

12.10.2004

Hyper-parenting

From "A Nation of Wimps" (Psychology Today):

Parents need to abandon the idea of perfection and give up some of the invasive control they've maintained over their children. The goal of parenting, Portmann reminds, is to raise an independent human being. Sooner or later, he says, most kids will be forced to confront their own mediocrity. Parents may find it easier to give up some control if they recognize they have exaggerated many of the dangers of childhood--although they have steadfastly ignored others, namely the removal of recess from schools and the ubiquity of video games that encourage aggression.
Wow.

"Sooner or later most kids will be forced to confront their own mediocrity."

I wonder if there's a bumper sticker for that.

Heh, heh, heh.
On the 2003 Suburban:
My child is an honor student at Fancy Preschool!

On the 2017 BMW:
Proud parent of a [insert name of "safety" school] College student!

On the 2039 Cadillac:
My child has finally confronted his mediocrity!

12.08.2004

Pointless post

A. wrote to advise me that she's having trouble seeing M-mv. My first thought? Oh, let me post to ask if anyone else is having trouble.

Yeah. I know. Duh.

On the other hand, aside from calling Mr. M-mv to ensure that he can see the site, what can a blogger do? Email everyone who has ever sent a message to M-mv? Sounds like spam to me.

12.07.2004

The recommended daily allowance

In another forum, I offered the following suggestions for a reader in search of a good biography.

Biography (literary)

The Life of Charlotte Bronte (Elizabeth Gaskill)

Roald Dahl: A Biography (Jeremy Treglown)

Jane Austen: A Life (Claire Tomalin)

James Joyce (Ralph Ellman)


Biography (historical)

John Adams (David McCullough)

Benjamin Franklin: An American Life (Walter Isaacson)

Lindbergh (A. Scott Berg)

Abe Lincoln Grows Up and Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years and The War Years (Carl Sandburg)


Biography (scientific)

Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love (Dava Sobel)


(Auto)biography

Uncle Tungsten: Memories of a Chemical Boyhood (Oliver Sacks)

Manhatten Memoir (Mary Cantwell)

Stet: An Editor's Life (Diana Athill)

Another Life: A Memoir of Other People (Michael Korda)

"Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!": Adventures of a Curious Character (Richard P. Feynman)

West With the Night (Beryl Markham)

12.06.2004

The recommended daily allowance



Yes, I just recommended this book a month ago. If you heeded my recommendation, you're nodding your head in agreement now. If you missed the RDA, then here is more encouragement to secure your own copy now.

[T]he function of a liberal arts education is to use major works of art and intellect to influence one's Final Narrative, one's outermost circle of commitments. A liberal education uses books to rejuvenate, reaffirm, replenish, revise, overwhelm, replace, in come cases (alas) even help begin to generate the web of words that we're defined by.
(p.31)


If you set theory between readers and literature -- if you make theory a prerequisite to discussing a piece of writing -- you effectively deny the student a chance to encounter the first level of literary density, the level he's ready to negotiate.
(p. 41)


The ultimate test of a book, or of an interpretation, is the difference it would make in the conduct of life.
(p. 73)


Humanism has a long and complex history, but for the purposes of this book, I want to describe humanistic education in a relatively condensed way. To me, humanism is the belief that it is possible for some of us, and maybe more than some, to use secular writing as the preeminent means for shaping our lives. That means that we might construct ourselves from novels, poems, and plays, as well as from works of history and philosophy, in the way that our ancestors constructed themselves (and were constructed) by the Bible and other sacred texts.
(p. 86)


Taking a deep initial delight in a book or an author is a little like falling in love. There is a nearly rapturous acceptance of all the author brings. The truth unfolds as if from above. But to adapt that vision to one's own uses, to bring it wisely into the world, more than love is necessary... The initial feeling of being swept off your feet by a book has got to be followed by more thoughtful commitment, as marriage follows love.
(p. 94)


Education is a gamble... This is what teachers, great and small, do: they wager that they can help people become one with their highest promise.
(p. 103)


Martha Nussbaum, one of the few thinkers now who is willing to suggest that literature and art matter because they can help people live better than they do, argues that becoming a citizen of the world is the objective of liberal arts education.
(p. 127)


The test of a book lies in its power to map or transform a life. The question we would ultimately ask of any work of art is this: Can you live it? If you cannot, it may still command considerable interest. The work may charm, it may divert. It may teach us something about the larger world; it may refine a point. But if it cannot help some of us to imagine a life, or unfold one already latent within, then it is not a major work, and probably not worth the time of students who, at this period in their lives, are looking to respond to consequential and very pressing questions.
(p. 129)


Books should be called major and become canonical when over time they provide existing individuals with live options that will help them change for the better. A democratic humanism can have no other standard for greatness.
(p. 129)


When human beings try to come to terms with who they are and describe who they hope to be, the most effective medium is words. Through words we represent ourselves to ourselves; we fix our awareness of who and what we are. Then we can step and gain distance on what we've said... In this process, words allow for precision and nuance that images and music don't permit.
(p. 135)

Miscellany

The Misses M-mv each set out a shoe last night after learning about the myth of St. Nicholas. "I don't know what I'd do with gold coins," mused Miss M-mv(i), "but some candy treats would be fun."

And they were.

Overheard
"What's that pony's name?"

"Teacher Supplies."

"What's her cutie mark?"

"See? An apple with an A+."

"Cool."

"Yeah."

What we're reading this morning
It's already dusk-dark... at 9:30 a.m. Yes, the country is draped in damp drear. Again.

But we have coffee. Comfy chairs. Books. Newspapers. Each other. Bring on the rain and fog. We've nothing to fear.

The Children's Blizzard (David Laskin)
You know I'm fond of well written disaster story.

Misty of Chincoteague (Marguerite Henry)
The Misses M-mv saw Misty this weekend. I noted that it was remarkably true to the book. "Do we have that book?" inquired Miss M-mv(i). Do we have that book? Of. Course. She's reading my childhood copy. (Yes, into my book-poor childhood crept a few volumes. Thank you, Aunts M- and M-. Thank you, teachers. Thank you, Scholastic Book Club. And thank you to a certain someone for reuniting me with precious friends.)

Sunwing (Kenneth Oppel)
The Misses M-mv read Silverwing and are now tackling the first of the follow-up titles.

Charlie Brown
From "The Comfort Zone" (The New Yorker, 11/22/2004):

On my night table was the “Peanuts Treasury,” a large, thick hardcover compilation of daily and Sunday funnies by Charles M. Schulz. My mother had given it to me the previous Christmas, and I’d been rereading it at bedtime ever since. Like most of the nation’s ten-year-olds, I had an intense, private relationship with Snoopy, the cartoon beagle. He was a solitary not-animal animal who lived among larger creatures of a different species, which was more or less my feeling in my own house. My brothers, who are nine and twelve years older than I, were less like siblings than like an extra, fun pair of quasi-parents. Although I had friends and was a Cub Scout in good standing, I spent a lot of time alone with talking animals. I was an obsessive rereader of A. A. Milne and the Narnia and Doctor Dolittle novels, and my involvement with my collection of stuffed animals was on the verge of becoming age-inappropriate. It was another point of kinship with Snoopy that he, too, liked animal games. He impersonated tigers and vultures and mountain lions, sharks, sea monsters, pythons, cows, piranhas, penguins, and vampire bats. He was the perfect sunny egoist, starring in his ridiculous fantasies and basking in everyone’s attention. In a cartoon strip full of children, the dog was the character I recognized as a child.


Heh, heh, heh. As an undergrad, I presented a short paper on the Peanuts comic strip as a microcosm of contemporary society. Hey! I heard that. I was not a geek. I was an ambitious scholarship student... who was, okay, a little geeky.

Related aside
Favorite seasonal music and video.

12.04.2004

How I spent my Saturday afternoon



Disgusted with the exorbitant rates being charged for wreaths, I thought, "How hard can this be?" Look. I'm not giving up my day job, but the rest of Family M-mv thought it was just fine.




To recover from my brush with arts and crafts (what's next? scrapbooking? ARGH!), I brewed more coffee, dropped fresh chocolate chip cookies on a plate, and reacquainted myself with some old friends.

An uncharacteristic note
Master M-v captured another first-place ribbon today. He's a reader, a thinker, a scholar, and quite an athlete.

12.03.2004

"Shop 'til We Drop?"

From the Wilson Quarterly (Winter 2004):

We shop, therefore we are. This is not exactly the American credo, but it comes close to being the American pastime. Even infants and toddlers quickly absorb the consumer spirit through television and trips to the supermarket (“I want that” is a common refrain). As we age, consumption becomes an engine of envy, because in America the idea is that everyone should have everything—which means that hardly anyone ever has enough. The notion that wants and needs have reached a limit of material and environmental absurdity, though preached fervently by some social activists and intellectuals, barely influences ordinary Americans. They continue to flock to shopping malls, automobile dealers, cruise ships, and health clubs. There are always, it seems, new wants and needs to be satisfied.


Read the complete essay here.

Related entry
Earlier this year, I shared with you "A mall story," but Family M-mv usually avoids the call of the mall (yes, even during the Christmas shopping season) and wanton consumerist behavior. (No, book acquisitions do not fall under the heading "wanton consumerist behavior." Book buying is part of our gentle madness.)

Watching birds

In this entry, I rather plaintively asked, "Just tell me why, oh, why the dark-eyed juncos, the woodpeckers, and the cardinals flee just before I 'Click!'?"

A. writes:

I have been watching birds for at least 20 years. By watching, I mean identifying them using bird identification handbooks and going to birding festivals to gain more information on which birds live in which environments. I listen to birders talk about their craft and glean information from the tails of their conversations. Of course, I have bird feeders. From all this activity (mostly from watching the bird feeders) I have come to the conclusion that birds are telepathic. Quit laughing. They tolerate me watching them, even tolerate my moving around, getting the binoculars, and looking at them closer. Do they like being photographed? Not in my experience. Either the birds know the difference between what a camera looks like in my hand while I sit at the back of my house in the shadows and what a set of binoculars the same size looks like, or they are reading my intention of photographing them and don't want their photos taken. Why else would they fly away whenever I get the camera out and set it on the ledge that holds the binoculars. If I put the cameral back in its bag, the birds return.

Now, I know that blizzards are not the cause of pregnancy despite the rise in the birthrate nine months following a blizzard, but I am more and more convinced that birds are telepathic due to my experiences with trying to get any photgraph of birds at my bird feeders.

The writer's bookshelf (Part I)

"Part I" was an afterthought, or maybe, more precisely, it was an attempt to cover my capacious, erm, behind since, in a first pass, I can't hope to identify all of the books that have shaped, refined, or even redefined my writing life. By tacking "Part I" onto to the title of the entry, then, I'm acknowledging the list's incompleteness.

Of course, all that I have read has, in one way or another, altered the landscape of my imagination.

And this is as it should be.

But here I only hope to satisfy the curiosity of the readers who have written to ask about the books on which I rely as a writer.

It's a relatively short list.

The essential titles

The Chicago Manual of Style

Writer's Market 2005

The New Oxford American Dictionary

The New York Public Library Desk Reference

Bartlett's Familiar Quotations: A Collection of Passages, Phrases, and Proverbs Traced to Their Sources in Ancient and Modern Literature

Two decades of bylines ago, I needed (or believed I needed) many other titles within reach. But the internet and, yes, experience mean fewer "essentials" on the writer's desk.

A related aside
Two decades of bylines ago, I also believed that writing required a bouquet of freshly sharpened pencils, an orderly stack of yellow legal pads, and my favorite chair. Oh, the pretensions and preoccupations of the beginning writer... to say nothing of the writer who fancies the idea of being a writer more than the work of being a writer.

Many a beginning writer overcomes the pretensions and preoccupations (with the "right" writing utensil, the "ideal" paper, the "perfect" chair), but the latter rarely does, and consequently, he generally doesn't accumulate (m)any bylines. You can quickly identify this writer at a party, writer's group, or online forum: He talks about what he's going to write. A lot. But don't bother following up when you next meet. He didn't start the project, or, if he did, he has already abandoned it for his next big idea.

A bit of unsolicited advice: If you want to write, don't busy yourself with sharpening pencils and don't spend too much time talking about what you're going to write.

Just write.

Reading about writing
Writing is not terribly difficult, but writing well is.

From Stephen King's gem On Writing:

Writers form themselves into the pyramid we see in all areas of human talent and human creativity. At the bottom are the bad ones. Above them is a group which is slightly smaller but still large and welcoming; these are the competent writers. They may also be found on the staff of your local newspaper, on the racks at your local bookstore, and at poetry readings on Open Mike Night... The next level is much smaller. These are the really good writers. Above them — above almost all of us — are the Shakespeares, the Faulkners, the Yeatses, Shaws, and Eudora Weltys. They are geniuses, divine accidents, gifted in a way which is beyond our ability to understand... [M]ost geniuses aren't able to understand themselves, and many of them lead miserable lives, realizing (at least on some level) that they are nothing but fortunate freaks....


"Really good" (like King and, say, for example, Joyce Carol Oates and John Updike) and "fortunate freak" are not in my future, so I get by with "competent" (if I do say so myself). Heh, heh, heh. Competent's fine. Hey, it pays the bills (although, fewer now, far fewer than it did when I was "hack-writing" (PR, marketing lit, etc.)).

Moreover, "competent" enables me to write to learn.

But more about that worthy topic some other time.

For now, let me just get a few more titles out there. I'll call them... hmmmm... "Not essential but worth the time"? Nah. Let's go with

Books about writing and the writing life

Presented in no particular order

On Writing (Stephen King)

The Orwell Reader
("Politics and the English Language")

Stet: An Editor's Life (Diana Athill)

Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life (Anne Lamott)

Walking on Alligators: A Book of Meditations for Writers (Susan Shaughnessy)

Words Fail Me: What Everyone Who Writes Should Know about Writing (Patricia T. O'Connor, who also wrote the wonderful Woe Is I)

Writing and the Writer (Frank Smith)

For Writers Only (Sophy Burnham)

Line by Line: How to Improve Your Own Writing (Claire Kehrwald Cook)

A Room of One's Own (Virginia Woolf)

Becoming a Writer (Dorothea Brande)

The Faith of a Writer: Life, Craft, Art (Joyce Carol Oates, whose (Woman) Writer is also worth having)

The Writer's Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers (Christopher Vogel)

On Writing Well (William Zinsser)

The Elements of Style (Strunk and White)

Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity & Grace (Joseph M. Williams)

More on this subject when time and inclination permit. Until then, read, think, learn.

And eat some homemade chocolate chip cookies.

12.02.2004

This and that



Hmmmm.

The "old" Gateway hasn't been get much use lately; I've been favoring Mr. M-mv's zippity-quick laptop since the move, especially over the last month. Today, though, I wanted to post before dinner, so I powered up the ancient machine.

Whirr. Gurgle. Splutter. Connecting....

Wow.

The photos I posted to the site look ever so much different on his monitor. The "Silent night, snowy night" photo, for example, was quite clear, lovely even, when I checked "Mental multivitamin" from his computer. From this one? Gosh, it's hard to tell why I even bothered posting it.

Oh, well.

The short story on that photo (for those who are also driving the information highway in older vehicles): The country wrapped in snowy quilts is quite unlike Chicago in the same weather. Exquisite, especially at night. On Monday night, I was, once again, charmed by our new home.

Now, the photo I posted today should be clear for all viewers. It was actually taken yesterday at about 7:30 a.m. I was nursing a second mug of coffee while slouching against the kitchen counter, my favorite morning perch, and I realized, "Hey! I can blog this."

Just tell me why, oh, why the dark-eyed juncos, the woodpeckers, and the cardinals flee just before I "Click!"?

A mid-cycle check of the nightstand...

The Stories of English (David Crystal)
Chocolate chip cookies. My fuzzy blanket from Nana. A tome about language. Must be Thursday night in December at House M-mv.

The Tale of Three Trees (Angela Elwell Hunt)
You don't have to be religious to appreciate this gorgeous retelling of an old, old story.

Never Threaten to Eat Your Co-Workers: Best of Blogs (Bonnie Burton)
Heh, heh, heh. A disparaging remark about mommy blogs (particularly banal and/or poorly written mommy blogs) briefly flickered on the old screen. Delete. (Albeit, reluctantly.)

Zephyr: Tracking a Dream Across America (Henry Kisor)
Mr. M-mv is between sea stories.

Rent (Jonathan Larson Estate)
Yes, I've seen (and adored) it.

... and the basket beside the television








Art and science
From "Optics and Realism in Renaissance Art" (Scientific American, December 2004):

When we consider the grand trajectory of Western painting, we see something very interesting taking place at the dawn of the Renaissance. Before roughly 1425, most images were rather stylized, even schematic, but afterward we see paintings that have an almost photographic realism. For instance, Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife, by the early Renaissance master Jan van Eyck (1390?–1441), reveals a three-dimensionality, presence, individuality and psychological depth lacking in earlier works. For the first time, we find portraits that really look like us. What happened?

In seeking to explain the emergence of this remarkable new art, or ars nova as it was called, the celebrated contemporary artist David Hockney came up with a bold and controversial theory. He claimed that Renaissance paintings look realistic--possessing what he called "the optical look"--because artists used lenses and mirrors to project images onto canvases or similar surfaces and then trace and paint over the results.

12.01.2004

A grief ago

The text (Dylan Thomas) and the illustrations (Chris Raschka) of A Child's Christmas in Wales have transformed the geography of the imaginations of the Misses M-mv, whose desks are strewn with their own drawings depicting their favorite passages of this seasonal favorite.

"But that was not the same snow," I say. "Our snow was not only shaken from white wash buckets down the sky, it came shawling out of the ground and swam and drifted out of the arms and hands and bodies of the trees; snow grew overnight on the roofs of the houses like a pure and grandfather moss, minutely ivied the walls and settled on the postman, opening the gate, like a dumb, numb thunder-storm of white, torn Christmas cards."

"Were there postmen then, too?"

"With sprinkling eyes and wind-cherried noses, on spread, frozen feet they crunched up to the doors and mittened on them manfully. But all that the children could hear was a ringing of bells."
Have you heard Thomas read this treasure? We'll wait.

"Death has caught me, / it lurks in my bedroom, and everywhere I look, / everywhere I turn, there is only death."
(Gilgamesh, Book XI)
I reread A Child Christmas in Wales last night, then knocked Gilgamesh (and a (thank goodness!) empty mug) from the nightstand when I set it down. Certainly this was an invitation to return to Stephen Mitchell's most wonderful seminar on the hero's journey, "the mother of all heroes' journeys," writes Mitchell, "with its huge uninhibited mythic presences moving through a landscape of a dream."

The archetypal hero's journey proceeds in stages: being called to action, meeting a wise man or guide, crossing the threshold into the numinous world of the adventure, passing various tests, attaining the goal, defeating the forces of evil, and going back home. It leads to a spiritual transformation at the end, a sense of gratitude, humility, and deepened trust in the intelligence of the universe. After he finds the treasure or slays the dragon or wins the princess or joins with the mind of the sage, the hero can return to ordinary life in a state of grace, as a blessing to himself and to his whole community. He has suffered, he has triumphed, he is at peace.
So Gilgamesh is a quest story, maintains Mitchell, but on close inspection, it's a "bizarre, quirky, and postmodern" one.

Ayup.

Paging through Mitchell's remarkable version of "the oldest story in the world, a thousand years older than the Iliad or the Bible," I paused, as I have several times now, at Book VIII. Enkindu, Gilgamesh's best friend, has died. "Hear me, elders, hear me, young men," laments Gilgamesh,

"[M]y beloved friend is dead, he is dead,
my beloved brother is dead, I will mourn
as long as I breathe, I will sob for him
like a woman who has lost her only child.
O, Enkindu, you were the axe at my side
in which my arm trusted, the knife in my sheath,
the shield I carried, my glorious robe,
the wide belt around my loins, and now
a harsh fate has torn you from me, forever.
And, as before, the cadences of his profound grief recalled to me W.H. Auden:

Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
Silence the pianos and with muffled drum
Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves.

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood.
For nothing now can ever come to any good.
"Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
("Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night," Dylan Thomas)
And as is my wont, I sat up at precisely 3:14 a.m. and marveled anew at how playfully, skillfully the brain arranges its thoughts when left to its own dreamy devices.

Dylan Thomas. Gilgamesh. W.H. Auden.

A grief ago...

Were my mind as facile during my waking hours, I'd be a force with which to be reckoned.

I hope this proves helpful, A.

The recommended daily allowance